![]() This will increase the scanning time but will catch more spamī. You can also turn on the "Razor2" option in the spamAssassin tab but this will increase the overall scanning time.ģ. Just click on the the update button to make sure that you have the latest ruleset. There is also a spamAssassin rule set updater in MxScan. You can create additional filters using keywords or regex expressions.Ģ. Under the content filters, there are some suggested filters to catch viagra spam and such. I'm tired of all the Viagra//Microsoft apps spam.įirst off, make sure you are running the latest version.ġ. I want to really crank down on this thing. RobertCF wrote:Actually, the problem is a few are being tagged SPAM-LOW and are really spam, but most of the worst spam aren't being tagged or stopped. There is also an option for Message Sniffer integration which boasts of more than 98% catch rates as a single test alone. Dealing with False Negatives is much easier because the Professional Version comes with an additional tests which should catch most of the remainding spam. You should start out with conservative scores and increase over time if necessary in order to avoid False Postives. If you are getting a lot of hits for the "Low" filter action then increase the scores a bit. My advice though is to stick with the default spam filter scores but instead fine tune the scores under "filter actions". Its safe to say that if a message fails multiple test the likely hood that it is spam is high. The general idea here to use cumumlative scores to determine an action to be taken. Vice versa, if there are false negatives you can increase or enable more tests. However, you can further fine tune it over time so it better fits your environment by reviewing the transaction log.įor instance if you find that a certain filter/test/rule is causing false positives you can lower the score for that particular test. The system comes with default scores that will fit most installations. There are no hard rules when it comes to scoring given the diversity and volume of spam received. RobertCF wrote:Can someone shed some light on the scoring system used? I don't see any explanation in the application that tells me what number(s) should be used to really crank down on content vs ones that will simply cause it to flag the mail as suspect.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |